Serena Kozakura a Japanese pin-up/bikini model was convicted of kicking a hole in the door to a man’s apartment and crawling through the hole because he was shacking up with another lady. Serena claimed that the man made the hole himself. During the appeal her lawyer busted out the big boob defense. The lawyer argued that there was no way Serena could squeeze her 44 inch bust through the hole in the man’s door. Judge Kunio Harada of the Tokyo High Court agreed and threw out the guilty verdict.
Is the first time the big boob defense has been used to successfully win a case? Can someone with LexisNexis look this up? Why didn’t the lawyers use this little slice of genius the first time around? I wish they would have brought the door into the court room and asked Serena to demonstrate how she couldn’t fit through the hole. I tried to find a better picture of the case winning boobs but Google Image search came up with nothing which was a little bit of a bummer. How am I supposed to judge the merits of this defense myself if I can’t get a good idea of the boobs we are talking about?
UPDATE: Thanks to Mr. Rappaport for sending in the picture below. She would have needed to make a big ass hole to get through the door.
Original Story: Yahoo News
{ 2 trackbacks }
{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }
This sets precedence for other defenses… too much junk in the trunk. “If the budonkadonk doesn’t fit, you must acquit!”
Wow %) nice