We’ve did a “then & now” over the course of two weeks with the ladies of Saved by the Bell by this time are going head-to-head straight out of the gate. Jennifer Aniston circa sometime in the mid-90s is challenging Jennifer Aniston from this month’s GQ magazine cover. Since I don’t have an exact date on the “then” photo it’s hard to give an exact range but I would guess that there is something like 10 to 15 years separating these two shots. So do you prefer mid-90s runaway-bride-Rachel-Green Jennifer Aniston or the post-Brad-Pitt-almost-40-still-smokin’-hot Jennifer Aniston?
Who Is Hotter?
- Jennifer Aniston Now (92.0%, 690 Votes)
- Jennifer Aniston Then (8.0%, 63 Votes)
Total Voters: 753
Loading ...Share and Bookmark This Post:
{ 2 trackbacks }
{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }
If you are going to make this a fair comparison, you need to show the rolling stone cover of her from 96, where she is also nude. http://www.rollingstone.com/photos/gallery/5392204/getting_naked/photo/1
She was hotter then if using this pic.
JENIFER BEFORE IS FLAT CHEST, BIG NOSE, FATTY…. NOW IS PLASTIC RHINOPLASTIES, FAKE BOOBS, FAKE CHIN, FAKE UPPER LIP, FAKE FACELIFTED, FAKE BLONDE HAIR, FAKE DEEP BLUE EYES ETC…
You can’t compare Jen natural beauty before and plastic beauty now. No way. Plastic is zero. Mean now she more ugly than before.
STUPPID TO COMPARE JENIFER ANISTON BEFORE AND AFTER. SHE FAKE EVERYTHING NOW. HOW DO YOU COMPARE BETWEEN SILICON, SALINE WATER,PLASTIC, COLLAGEN, BOTOX AND HUMAN TISSUE?????? ?ARE YOU BLIND OR DUMB?